A juror within the trial of Lindsay Clancy is sharing new particulars about what he stated occurred contained in the jury room that led to a mistrial within the case of the Massachusetts girl going through first-degree homicide fees for the 2023 deaths of her three younger youngsters.
Nick Dargie, one of many three males on the 12-person jury, informed ABC Information’ Aaron Katersky that the lone holdout juror who prevented a unanimous verdict didn’t present any proof explaining his vote.
“There was a number of instances I’d ask him to indicate us proof or, you realize, describe a witness testimony that helped to show what he was saying, and … he could not,” Dargie, 25, stated in an interview Wednesday.
ABC Information – PHOTO: : Nick Dargie, 25, a juror within the Lindsay Clancy trial, speaks with ABC Information’ Aaron Katersky on Sept. 9, 2026.
Jury deliberations finally yielded an 11-1 break up in favor of not responsible by cause of madness, however the remaining juror wouldn’t change his place favoring conviction, in line with different jurors who spoke out publicly.
Lindsay Clancy’s legal professional Kevin Reddington asks Trump for pardon after mistrial
“There wasn’t a single piece of proof or witness testimony that he used to show why he was pondering the best way he was, which is why we in the end despatched in that observe,” Dargie stated, referring to a observe the jury foreperson gave to Decide William Sullivan, resulting in the mistrial. “In any other case, like there’s nothing mistaken with anyone having a very reverse opinion … that may be a hung jury. That, like that, is our justice system.
Clancy pleaded not responsible to a few homicide fees for the deaths of her 5-year-old daughter Cora, 3-year-old son Dawson and toddler son Callan on the household’s dwelling in Duxbury, a Boston suburb, on Jan. 24, 2023.
Greg Derr/Pool by way of AP – PHOTO: Defendant Lindsay Clancy appears to be like on the jury after Decide William Sullivan declared a mistrial in Clancy’s homicide trial, Sept. 4, 2026, in Plymouth, Mass.
Her five-week trial led to a mistrial on Sept. 4, after every week of deliberations.
All through Clancy’s trial, a lot of the testimony centered on whether or not or not she was affected by postpartum psychosis — thought of a psychiatric emergency, in line with the American Faculty of Obstetricians and Gynecologists — when she strangled her youngsters and tried to take her personal life, and whether or not she needs to be held criminally answerable for the killings.
Jurors in Massachusetts are instructed that with a view to show a defendant is criminally accountable for their conduct, prosecutors should “show past an inexpensive doubt that the defendant didn’t undergo from a psychological illness or defect on the time of the alleged offense,” in line with the Massachusetts Court docket System.
Patrick Clancy’s legal professional requires finish to ‘defamation marketing campaign’ in opposition to him
Plymouth County District Legal professional Timothy Cruz has not but introduced a choice on whether or not to retry Clancy.
“I admire the truth that there are robust emotions and opinions tied to this case,” Cruz stated exterior the courthouse on Sept. 4, when the mistrial was declared. “Nevertheless, our job is to put aside our emotions and focus solely on the info. The info are Lindsay Clancy killed her three youngsters and the proof instructed to us that she was accountable for her actions when she dedicated these homicides.”
The 2 sides are scheduled to be in courtroom on Sept. 29 to find out subsequent steps following the mistrial.
Tune into “Good Morning America” on Thursday, Sept. 10 from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. ET on ABC to see extra of Aaron Katersky’s unique interview with Nick Dargie, a juror within the Lindsay Clancy trial.