Picture-Illustration: New York Journal; Supply: Robert O. Ballou, Harper & Brothers, Random Home, Wilcox & Follett
The plot of each Jewish vacation goes one thing like this: They tried to kill us, we survived, let’s eat. On Purim, we revel within the story of a Persian court docket adviser who tries and fails to exterminate the Jews. We skip the half the place, after he’s hanged, those self same Jews kill 75,000 Persians as a type of preemptive self-defense. At Seder, we make a meal out of being slaves in Egypt; Hagar, the Egyptian slave owned by Abraham and Sarah, tends to go unmentioned.
These particulars didn’t make it into my non secular training. They might have sophisticated the bigger narrative that many Jews inform ourselves and others about who we’re: a powerless, morally infallible minority struggling to remain alive in a world that wishes us useless.
I perceive the enchantment of this story. Telling it retains us tethered to our previous, which all too typically has been a historical past of persecution. As Peter Beinart factors out in his latest guide, Being Jewish After the Destruction of Gaza, “there are nonetheless fewer Jews alive right now than there have been in 1939. It’s not stunning, then, that sufferer typically looks like our pure function.” And it’s not simply historical past: The previous yr has seen lethal assaults in opposition to Jews in Washington, D.C., and Boulder, Colorado. To some, Hamas’ bloodbath on October 7 was proof that the story is as related now as ever.
Israel’s genocidal marketing campaign in Gaza has laid naked the plot holes on this story. One particularly evident inconsistency is that whereas we’re a small minority, and although we’re persecuted in lots of quarters, we’re not powerless. The truth is, Jews in the USA and Israel wield a substantial amount of energy — economically, politically, and militarily. In line with a Pew survey performed in 2020, about half of American Jews report their revenue as being not less than $100,000, “a lot greater than the share of all U.S. households at that degree.” From 2010 to 2020, a 3rd of Supreme Court docket justices have been Jewish, although Jews make up lower than 3 p.c of the U.S. inhabitants. Israel is a rich nation with a sturdy navy broadly believed to have nuclear weapons. That nation has killed not less than 66,000 Palestinians since October 7, round half of whom have been ladies and kids. A lot for ethical infallibility.
However Jewish energy is usually mere subtext to our story. Acknowledging it may possibly really feel like giving gas to antisemites, who see in these statistics proof of an unlimited con spiracy. That’s not the one cause we battle to just accept our energy. It additionally scrambles our collective sense of self and forces us to take duty for what has been executed in our identify. “It evokes one thing unnerving,” Beinart writes, “one thing our custom is aware of: that Jews will be Pharaohs too.” However the place in our custom? I’m not a scholar of the Torah, however I’m a novelist, and for the previous hundred years, the novel, not the Torah or the Talmud, has been the medium by which many American Jews work by questions of id and morality. And so I sifted by a century of tales within the hope of understanding how Jewish writers in America have addressed their ever-changing relationship to energy.
One doesn’t must have learn Henry Roth’s opus Name It Sleep to know the narrative tropes of the Jewish American immigrant expertise. They have been illustrated in Sydney Taylor’s youngsters’s collection, All-of-a-Type Household, and dedicated to celluloid in movies like As soon as Upon a Time in America and, extra not too long ago, The Brutalist. Rising up within the ’90s, I first encountered a lot of them second-hand, as within the Simpsons episode during which Krusty the Clown is revealed to be Herschel Krustofsky, a rabbi’s son who grew up on the Decrease East Facet of Springfield.
These tales all deal in a technique or one other with the challenges of the Jewish immigrant, particularly poverty and marginalization. So I used to be shocked to find, in my late 20s, a physique of early Jewish American fiction that offers with a seemingly opposed set of issues: these of assimilation and success. The truth is, the primary main Jewish American novel, 1917’s The Rise of David Levinsky, by Abraham Cahan, reads like Ragged Dick on downers: The eponymous hero pulls himself out of poverty solely to finish up rich however alone, trapped in a life “devoid of significance.” Because it turned out, Jewish American writers have been worrying about the price of energy for the reason that first nice wave of immigration introduced hundreds of thousands of Japanese European Jews to those shores.
An analogous trajectory — rags to riches to remorse — haunts the fiction of Anzia Yezierska, the opposite main Jewish American author within the a long time earlier than Name It Sleep. Like many Jewish immigrants of her era, Yezierska fled the Russian empire and landed on the Decrease East Facet, the place she labored in sweatshops, eating places, and laundries. Her first story to realize recognition, “The Fats of the Land” from 1919, is a cautionary story of upward mobility, a theme she would return to all through her profession.
Once we first meet Hanneh Breineh, the protagonist, she is half-mad with starvation and struggling to feed her six youngsters. All of the hallmarks of Jewish immigrant fiction will be discovered within the story’s first pages: the cramped tenement, the stale bread, the pushcarts. “With out cash,” she tells her neighbor, Mrs. Pelz, “I’m a dwelling useless one.” Years later, one in every of Hanneh’s sons finds success within the garment enterprise and strikes his mom uptown. On Riverside Drive, Hanneh can’t relate to her new neighbors. Her spoiled youngsters criticize her immigrant manners. She feels “reduce off from air, from life, from all the things heat and human,” her materials comforts having “choked and crushed the life inside her.” Fed up together with her luxe lodging, Hanneh ultimately returns to Delancey Avenue to stick with Mrs. Pelz. When she arrives, nonetheless, she finds she will’t tolerate the chilly, the mice, the dirty mattress. She might not really feel at house in her new life, however she isn’t house in her previous one, both.
The story ends with Hanneh standing within the rain outdoors her Riverside Drive residence, “unable to enter, and but figuring out full effectively that she must enter.” Different characters in Yezierska’s fiction meet an analogous destiny upon getting a style of the nice life. Some important a part of them is all the time left behind.
It’s no shock that writers like Cahan and Yezierska cautioned in opposition to extravagant materials wealth; like many Decrease East Facet Jews, they have been socialists. However the story will not be merely about politics. After publishing her first assortment — a yr after “The Fats of the Land” — Yezierska obtained a telegram from a Hollywood agent asking her to “ phone instantly.” Too poor to name the film studio, she pawned her mom’s Sabbath scarf for 1 / 4, which she fed right into a pay telephone. When she reached the agent, she discovered Samuel Goldwyn needed to purchase the movie rights to her guide for $10,000. Within the press, Yezierska quickly turned often called the “Sweatshop Cinderella,” spirited away from Hester Avenue to Hollywood by limousine.
The fairy story got here to a fittingly Yezierskan finish. She later wrote that her success left her feeling “just like the beggar who drowned in a barrel of cream,” reduce off from the individuals and the poverty that had been her inventive inspiration. Inside a decade, she had vanished into obscurity. (A critic accused her of exhausting the one story she needed to inform.) In an article for Cosmopolitan referred to as “This Is What $10,000 Did to Me,” she wrote that she had misplaced her soul.
After World Struggle II, anxieties about assimilation impressed an more and more morally advanced literature. Writers like Philip Roth, Saul Bellow, Grace Paley, Norman Mailer, Cynthia Ozick, and Bernard Malamud skilled their appreciable energies on questions of id, exploring what it meant to carry twin loyalties to a democratic perfect and to at least one’s personal tribe. Not like Yezierska, these writers have been born and raised in America (or Canada, in Bellow’s case) and wrote within the American Century. Native English audio system with public educations, they principally occupied a better social standing than their mother and father, from whom they inherited what the critic Irving Howe referred to as “an ironic relationship to energy.” To Howe, this was their “cultural legacy.”
Roth probed that relationship in his breakout 1959 brief story, “Defender of the Religion.” Its topic is Sheldon Grossbart, a navy trainee who exploits his Judaism for private achieve. He will get out of barracks cleanings by claiming he has to go to shul. He calls for particular meals regardless of not maintaining kosher. But irrespective of how a lot Grossbart bothers his tremendous visor, Sergeant Nathan Marx, the sergeant finds himself defending his trainee. If Grossbart represents a sure sort of Jewish determine — powerless however intelligent, surviving by his wits — Marx represents one other and, on the time, newer sort: the half-assimilated firm man, torn between tribal solidarity and his duties to the dominant tradition (on this case, the U.S. navy) that has granted him a measure of conditional energy. Like Roth, who insisted he was not an “American Jewish author” however an American author, Marx’s loyalty is to his nation — however all it takes is a Yiddish time period of endearment to undo him. “‘Leben!’” he thinks, when he hears Grossbart use the phrase. “My grandmother’s phrase for me!”
Towards the top, Grossbart goes over Marx’s head and pulls some strings to get himself out of fight obligation. Marx retaliates by pulling a string of his personal, getting Grossbart again on the record of troopers headed to the Pacific, doubtlessly turning his co-religionist into cannon fodder. This isn’t a call he makes frivolously: The story ends with Marx “ resisting with all my will an impulse to show and search pardon for my vindictiveness.” However he does resist and takes duty for what he’s executed.
When “Defender” was printed in The New Yorker, it prompted an uproar. Institution Jews felt Roth had painted them in a poor mild. The issue was Grossbart, whose conniving appeared to corroborate the worst stereotypes concerning the Jewish individuals — and so quickly after the Shoah. In the present day, as debates rage on about whether or not Israel will be each a Jewish state and a real democracy — for Beinart, the reply is “no” — it’s Sergeant Marx who appears extra prone to offend hard-line Jewish Zionists, prioritizing democratic ideas over tribal affinities. Such choices aren’t straightforward, Roth suggests, particularly when a 3rd of the tribe in query has simply been wiped off the face of the earth. Nonetheless, even these with restricted entry to energy have a duty to their ideas.
In 2016, I used to be excited to study that Jonathan Safran Foer’s new novel, Right here I Am, his first in 11 years, can be set totally within the current day. I had grown up studying Foer within the aughts, a decade that noticed a resurgence in Jewish American fiction. A 2009 essay in Self-importance Truthful, “Rise of the New Yiddishists,” by David Sax, cited such figures as Nathan Englander, Michael Chabon, Dara Horn, Nicole Krauss, and Foer as redefining what it meant to be a Jewish American author, in search of inspiration in Jewish historical past, people tales, and mysticism. Theirs have been finest -selling, prizewinning books a lot mentioned in Jewish households like mine.
As Sax identified, the New Yiddishists “emerged throughout a turning level for American Jewish id. By no means in historical past have Jews been so built-in and accepted into the mainstream of a Diaspora nation.” This acceptance allowed them to plumb the previous and write “unabashedly, unambiguous[ly]” Jewish tales. Simply as notable was what they didn’t write as a lot about: their very own lives as American Jews within the new millen nium. In The Nation, William Deresiewicz wrote that they “seem like avoiding their very own expertise as a result of their very own expertise simply appears too boring.” As an alternative of participating with the which means of this new sense of safety, which was prone to be non permanent and conditional anyway, this new era of Jewish writers sought inspiration in previous historic traumas — the Civil Struggle (All Different Nights), the Soiled Struggle (The Ministry of Particular Circumstances), World Struggle II and the Holocaust ( Every little thing Is Illuminated, The Historical past of Love, The Superb Adventures of Kavalier & Clay) — or, within the case of Right here I Am, imagined ones.
Right here I Am is the story of a household in Washington, D.C., and far of the novel is anxious with the home: a sick canine, a funeral, a divorce. In different phrases, the stuff of a lot modern fiction, albeit from a Jewish perspective, that includes Jewish characters with uniquely Jewish preoccupations: a boy’s bar mitzvah speech, the state of Steven Spielberg’s foreskin. 200 and fifty pages into the novel, nonetheless, an unlikely earthquake results in a warfare between Israel and an unlikelier “ Transarabian” alliance. (The earthquake is a handy method to get a warfare going with out getting slowed down in questions of accountability.) Though dozens of pages are dedicated to the warfare, it stays within the background, rendered as a collection of headlines and information interviews.
That is undoubtedly a part of Foer’s broader level concerning the security of being Jewish in America, the hazard of being Jewish within the Center East, and the distance — religious in addition to geographic — between these states of being. However as I learn the again half of the novel, I began to suspect that Foer didn’t belief that his readers can be moved by the mundane lives of his characters and so contrived a catastrophe to hold them on.
Jacob, the protagonist, is continually bemoaning his small issues, “small ideas,” and “small emotions.” After all, there’s nothing small a few divorce or the dying of a cherished one; on a regular basis home affairs animate many, if not most, main works of literary fiction. However studying Right here I Am, I discovered they did really feel small, largely as a result of Jacob retains fretting that they’re. Not like his Israeli cousin’s, his life will not be at risk. Not like his grandfather, he’s not a Holocaust survivor. Assimilation and safety have robbed him of the sense that his life is significant, pressing, and essential.
This may need been fruitful terrain for Foer had he not so plainly shared his character’s considerations. Slightly than discover what it means to be a Jew in a time and place the place, for as soon as, we aren’t staring down extinction, Foer felt the necessity to increase the stakes — as if there may very well be no Jewish story with out widespread struggling. His earlier novels, each finest sellers, centered on world-historical tragedies: the Holocaust, the bombing of Dresden, 9/11. Missing a recent tragedy for Right here I Am, Foer appeared compelled to invent one, inadvertently revealing the disaster on the coronary heart of Jewish American id.
These are unusual occasions to be an American Jew. Antisemitic hate crimes are on the rise; on the similar time, antisemitism has been weaponized by the Trump administration — and by mainstream Jewish American organizations — to quash dissent. We discover ourselves within the uncomfortable place of straddling vulnerability and complicity. The contem porary Jewish American novel that will finest seize this second is Joshua Cohen’s Shifting Kings. Printed in 2017, the guide has change into newly related for its portrayal of the 2014 Gaza Struggle — and the warfare’s influence on People.
The primary of the novel’s three sections follows David King, an outer-borough outsider at a flowery get together prowling for patrons and political connections. He runs his personal moving-and-storage firm, and his politics are “aspirational, inferior.” Like a Twenty first-century Sergeant Marx, he’s caught between stations. Like many Jews of his era, he doesn’t see himself as white, a lot much less a gentrifier: “His colour was Jewish.” His arguments along with his daughter about Israel might be acquainted to any Jewish particular person.
The second part belongs to David’s Israeli cousin, Yoav, and his military buddy, Uri. As troopers, they’ve the facility to terrorize Palestinians by destroying their houses — an influence they train out of boredom or for no cause in any respect. As ex-soldiers, nonetheless, they’re misplaced, traumatized by what they’ve seen and executed and hated in all places they go for being Jews, or Israelis, or (in ironic circumstances of mistaken id) Arabs. Cohen excels at describing the existential aimlessness afflicting younger males set unfastened upon the world after finishing their obligatory navy service. Lots of them surf and pay for intercourse whereas backpacking by Southeast Asia. Yoav and Uri wind up working for David.
The third part introduces one other primary character, Avery Luter, a.ok.a. Imamu Nabi, a Vietnam veteran dealing with eviction. The job falls to Yoav and Uri. The premise of the novel lies within the parallels between the Israeli occupation and the eviction of a Black Muslim from his house by Jewish American and Israeli movers: “They have been nonetheless going right into a home and checking the rooms by the ground. Checking for individuals, checking for possessions. Clearing the individuals earlier than clearing the possessions. The possessions would stick with them, the individuals have been allowed to go wherever, offered it was all the time on the opposite facet of the propertyline.”
Shifting Kings is the uncommon contem porary novel to grapple with the paradox of energy and persecution that defines Jewish life within the U.S. right now. Whether or not American Jews need that is one other story. Shifting Kings was launched to blended opinions: celebrated within the Washington Publish, panned within the New York Instances. Cohen’s subsequent novel, The Netanyahus, was set within the Nineteen Fifties and focuses on the one Jewish professor at a fictional faculty, a person on the receiving finish of a lot antisemitism. The novel not solely received the Pulitzer Prize, it received a Nationwide Jewish E-book Award. Given the variations in reception between these two books — one set within the current during which Jews are persecuting individuals and one set in a previous outlined by the persecution of the Jews — it appears clear which dynamic many people would like to linger on.
It’s nonetheless too quickly for novels written and set after October 7, however some tales have begun to trickle out. Cohen’s “My Camp,” printed final yr in The New Yorker, follows a author who protests the warfare by elevating cash on behalf of the IDF and sending it to charities for Gaza — however not earlier than shopping for himself a spot within the Pine Barrens. A slew of recent nonfiction books explores comparable terrain. The British author Rachel Cockerell’s Melting Level, printed earlier this yr within the U.S., is a formally ingenious historical past of the early days of Zionism. Pulitzer Prize winner Benjamin Moser can be engaged on a historical past of Zionism, as informed from the attitude of Jews around the globe who resisted it, referred to as Anti-Zionism: A Jewish Historical past. Instances reporter Marc Tracy is writing a historical past of (and current report on) the Jewish Diaspora with the working title Far-Flung.
Then there’s Beinart. “From the destruction of the Second Temple to the expulsion from Spain to the Holocaust,” he writes in Being Jewish After the Destruction of Gaza, “Jews have informed new tales to reply the horrors we endured. We should now inform a brand new story to reply the horror {that a} Jewish nation has perpetrated, with the assist of many Jews around the globe.” The problem dealing with Jewish fiction writers right now is in telling that story or tales prefer it — tales during which Jews behave badly within the identify of Judaism — with out worry that our work might be used in opposition to us or co-opted to nefarious ends.
Then once more, that’s virtually an occupational hazard. Numerous Jewish American writers have been accused of sketching unflattering portraits of their individuals; the Zionist activist Eliahu Ben-Horin referred to as “Defender of the Religion” an “ugly piece of antisemitic literature.” However literature will not be public relations and, in any case, can’t be written from a spot of worry. Defending “Defender” in 1963, Roth cautioned in opposition to permitting antisemites, or non-Jews typically, to regulate the dialog. “This isn’t combating antisemitism,” he wrote, “however submitting to it.”
Thanks for subscribing and supporting our journalism.
In case you favor to learn in print, you can even discover this text within the November 17, 2025, situation of
New York Journal.
Need extra tales like this one? Subscribe now
to assist our journalism and get limitless entry to our protection.
In case you favor to learn in print, you can even discover this text within the November 17, 2025, situation of
New York Journal.